To determine which methods of analysing continuous agreement are currently being used in the health sciences literature and quantify the frequency of different continuous agreement methods published in peer reviewed journals since 2010. Secondary objectives include assessment of whether inappropriate methods are still being used to analyse agreement; and to identify how many agreement studies have pre-defined a clinically acceptable difference (if appropriate).
Chief Investigator: Richard Parker
Number and location of participating sites (by region/country): N/A
EudraCT number: N/A
ISRCTN number: N/A
Funder: MRC
Start and End date
Of grant award: 11 January 2023 - 30 April 2026
Of recruitment: N/A
Current Status: Open
UK GDPR Privacy Statement: As part of Patient Information Sheet
ECTU involvement: Methodology / Statistics
This article was published on
