RAFTAA

To determine which methods of analysing continuous agreement are currently being used in the health sciences literature and quantify the frequency of different continuous agreement methods published in peer reviewed journals since 2010. Secondary objectives include assessment of whether inappropriate methods are still being used to analyse agreement; and to identify how many agreement studies have pre-defined a clinically acceptable difference (if appropriate).

Chief Investigator: Richard Parker 

Number and location of participating sites (by region/country): N/A

EudraCT number: N/A

ISRCTN number:  N/A

 

Funder: MRC

Start and End date

Of grant award: 11 January 2023 - 30 April 2026

Of recruitment: N/A

 

Current Status: Open

 

UK GDPR Privacy Statement: As part of Patient Information Sheet

 

ECTU involvement: Methodology / Statistics 

This article was published on